Photo Editing Air Software Demands Of

Yes, its fine. Itll probably do everything, just a little bit slower than a machine could do the job.

No, get the MBPro (15Retina 15 or the just removed 17 models which have much better CPUs and dedicated graphics chips, and would regularly outperform the Airs.

But of course many factors determine good performance, which are personal trade-offs.

Exporting takes a bit longer on the air, assumably due to the lower clocked cpu and lack of dedicated graphics card, as well as rendering appearing to be somewhat more sluggish.

Overall snappiness while using however is immense on the macbook air (the ssd helps a lot) and the processors are more than capable.

Have no fears, any of the current macbook air line will be more than capable of taking care of all your editing needs.

I have yet to use the machine for any after effects work though and to be honest I doubt it would be really capable in that respect.

Despite its smaller size and lighter weight, the MacBook Air can hold its own against larger, more powerful laptops.

The MacBook Airs maximum thickness is a mere 0.68 inch.

You can comfortably hold while open it in one hand, and the wedge-shaped design makes the laptop easy to slip into the pocket of a camera backpack.

With the MacBook Air you can run iPhoto 11, Photoshop CS5, Lightroom 3, or Aperture 3 anywhere.

But how does it hold up in the field Over the course of six weeks I traveled by plane, cab, bus, and on foot with a 13-inch 2.13GHz MacBook Air in my camera backpack.

I used it to edit photos, write articles, upload video, and manage my sites.

The allure of the Air is that it lets you pack a computer and still travel lightboth sizes can fit in your lap if youre flying economy class.

Its small enough that you can transport it in a camera bag, keeping your carry-on luggage to a minimum.

Inside that slim package is a robust battery that stays charged for a long time, letting you work on long flights; flash memory, which eliminates the worry of hard-drive failure; and enough power to run all major Mac photo apps, including Apples Aperture and Adobe Lightroom.

The field tests I did were on a build-to-order model: a 13-inch 2.13GHz MacBook Air with 4GB of RAM.

The faster, build-to-order model does increase the price of the Air, but the system performs better in benchmark tests.

I opted for the upgrades because of Aperture, which likes extra horsepower; however, they are not necessary to run any of these photo programs.

If space is at a premium, the 11-inch Air also works well for photographers on the road, showing minimal speed differences.

I have reports from shooters running Aperture on the 1199 11-inch model who were very satisfied.

There are a few key areas where the two models differ that photographers should take into consideration: The screen resolution for the 11-inch Air is smalleronly 1366 by 768.

With the 13-inch Airs larger 1440 by 900 screen, you have extra space for working on photos.

And only the 13-inch model includes an SD Card slot, so if your camera uses SD Cards, you wont need to pack a card reader or USB cable.

Your laptop is your office on the road, so it needs to handle all the types of work you do, including e-mail, Web browsing, and writing.

Photo Editing Air Software Demands Of

The Air manages those tasks handily while also meeting the special software demands of a photographer.

The 2.13GHz MacBook Air isnt quite as fast as the 15-inch 2.4GHz MacBook Pro, according to the Speedmark 6.5 scores (119 versus 132, respectively).

But in my real-world tests as a photographer, the Air performed quite well.

For example, I tested the MacBook Air against my older 17-inch, 2.5GHz MacBook Pro by importing raw files from a Canon EOS 60D into Aperture 3.

The MacBook Air averaged 53 seconds for 30 raw files versus 1 minute and 50 seconds for importing the same files off the same memory card from the older MacBook Pro.

Even after I enabled five or six adjustments, edits went smoothly, with little or no delay.

Photo Editing For Mac Air